The battle for universities: innovation and the knowledge economy

I was chatting with a friend of mine in the pub the other night, a lecturer at a good British university. I was talking about innovation in relation to my job, he in relation to his. The common factor is that we both work in a knowledge economy whose role it is to develop new ideas and move practice forward. We both had excellent university educations – ie we are well versed in exploratory learning. How to make connections, form hypotheses and develop arguments. But he started describing how that situation was crumbling. I was aware of the drive to certification. Aside from the headline-grabbing BAs in Golf Course Design there has been a growing emphasis on utilitarian degrees which involve learning a method so you can go out there and practice. As a result, we have loads of Marketing grads who can write great press releases but haven’t got a clue how to actually change behaviours. Plenty of IT grads who can plumb together systems, but can’t empower a transformational shift. This is not a good basis for a knowledge economy. These off the shelf degrees are easily commoditized and sold by others often overseas. The rise of very strong IT providers in India should be a warning to any undergrad choosing a course right now. In a world where change is accelerating, the ability to adapt and learn on the fly is a far more important skill than how to do something.

But recently the problem has begun to accelerate. My friend pointed me toward this article from the New York Review of Books.

In it the author connects the slashing of budgets with an expensive and misguided new management layer. Misguided because it is driven as ever by short term gain – courses that return on investment in a financial year, courses that attract maximum numbers of applicants. All at the expense of those disciplines that struggle to demonstrate impact – humanities – the exact one that gave the educational foundations I’ve relied on all my career. But managers need results, and those results have to be measurable. And the other thing – management’s tendency to breed and expand. The business of management and fund raising needs people – an managers not lecturers.

This is all pretty upsetting, not just because my friend is at worst, at risk of losig his job, and at best of losing the sovereignty of his department, but because it massively misjudged the importance of true university education to our position as a knowledge economy. Managers hate risks. It is something to be mitigated. Educators recognise that their world is risky – the chap taking six years to write a book could be the next leading european philosopher, opening up lines of thought an opportunity no-one had ever thought of. Isn’t that how it worked with Wittgenstein? Of course he might not. That’s the risk and it’s worth taking in mind. Worth protecting.

The lady opposite me on the train is reading the Evening Standard: “BA strikes to cause Easter chaos”. Well I think it’s time for one that reads “University strikes to cause applications chaos”. We’ve already sold out the next generation financially and environmentally, it’s time to fight for their education and the future foundation of our shared prosperity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: